SaaS Rule of 40 Calculator
Calculate your SaaS Rule of 40 score (revenue growth rate + profit margin). Benchmark against industry standards and top SaaS companies. Essential metric for investors and founders.
Revenue Growth Rate
300.0%
Benchmark Comparison
Examples:
- 40% growth + 0% profit = 40 ✓
- 25% growth + 15% profit = 40 ✓
- 10% growth + 30% profit = 40 ✓
- 100% growth + (-60%) profit = 40 ✓
Related Calculators
About This Calculator
The SaaS Rule of 40 Calculator evaluates whether your software company achieves the healthy balance between growth and profitability that investors demand. The Rule of 40 states that a sustainable SaaS business should have its revenue growth rate plus profit margin equal 40% or higher. As of Q1 2025, the median Rule of 40 score across SaaS companies is just 12%—with median growth of 10% and EBITDA margins of only 6% (SaaS Capital). Companies consistently achieving 40%+ command revenue multiples of 10.7x, while those below 20% struggle to raise capital. This calculator helps founders, CFOs, and investors assess SaaS health, compare against benchmarks, and identify whether to prioritize growth acceleration or margin improvement.
Trusted Sources
How to Use the SaaS Rule of 40 Calculator
- 1Choose your calculation mode: enter raw revenue figures or input percentages directly.
- 2For revenue mode: enter current period ARR/MRR, prior period ARR/MRR (12 months ago), and trailing 12-month EBITDA.
- 3For percentage mode: enter your year-over-year revenue growth rate (%) and EBITDA margin (%) directly.
- 4Select your profit metric: EBITDA margin (most common), operating margin, or free cash flow margin.
- 5Review your Rule of 40 score and see where you fall on the benchmark scale.
- 6Compare your performance to public SaaS companies and industry medians.
- 7Use the improvement simulator to model scenarios for reaching or exceeding 40.
2025 SaaS Benchmarks: The Sobering Reality
The Rule of 40 has become harder to achieve as SaaS growth rates moderate (SaaS Capital):
Q1 2025 Median Metrics:
| Metric | Median | Top Quartile | Top Decile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rule of 40 Score | 12% | 30%+ | 45%+ |
| Revenue Growth | 10% | 25%+ | 40%+ |
| EBITDA Margin | 6% | 15%+ | 25%+ |
| Gross Margin | 72% | 78%+ | 85%+ |
Score Distribution:
| Score Range | % of Companies | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 60%+ | ~3% | Elite tier |
| 40-60% | ~13% | Strong performers |
| 20-40% | ~35% | Moderate health |
| 0-20% | ~30% | Below benchmark |
| Below 0% | ~19% | High burn, needs attention |
Trend Analysis (2023-2025): Aggregate scores declined across nearly all company sizes:
- $1-5M ARR: 8% → -2% (growth slowing)
- $5-20M ARR: 15% → 10%
- $20-50M ARR: 22% → 16%
- $50M+ ARR: 28% → 22%
The "efficient growth" mandate from investors has improved profitability but at the cost of growth rates.
The Rule of 40 Formula and Variations
The core formula is simple, but implementation details matter:
Standard Rule of 40:
Rule of 40 Score = Revenue Growth Rate (%) + Profit Margin (%)
Example Calculations:
| Company | Growth | Margin | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 50% | -10% | 40% | Passes ✓ |
| B | 30% | 15% | 45% | Passes ✓ |
| C | 15% | 20% | 35% | Close |
| D | 80% | -50% | 30% | Below (despite hypergrowth) |
| E | 5% | 25% | 30% | Below (profitable but slow) |
Which Profit Metric to Use?
| Metric | Formula | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| EBITDA Margin | (Revenue - COGS - OpEx + D&A) / Revenue | Standard for Rule of 40 |
| Operating Margin | Operating Income / Revenue | Public companies |
| FCF Margin | Free Cash Flow / Revenue | VC-backed companies |
| Contribution Margin | (Revenue - Variable Costs) / Revenue | Unit economics analysis |
Growth Rate Calculation:
YoY Growth Rate = (Current ARR - Prior Year ARR) / Prior Year ARR × 100
Example:
Current ARR: $15M
Prior Year ARR: $10M
Growth Rate: ($15M - $10M) / $10M = 50%
Important: Use trailing twelve-month (TTM) figures to smooth quarterly volatility.
Rule of 40 by Company Stage and Funding
Expected performance varies significantly by company maturity:
By ARR Stage:
| ARR Range | Typical Growth | Expected Margin | Target Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1-5M | 60-100%+ | -40% to -20% | 30-60% |
| $5-20M | 40-70% | -20% to 0% | 30-50% |
| $20-50M | 25-45% | 0% to 15% | 35-50% |
| $50-100M | 20-35% | 10% to 20% | 35-45% |
| $100M+ | 15-30% | 15% to 25% | 35-50% |
By Funding Stage:
| Stage | Growth Expectation | Margin Tolerance | Investor Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seed/Series A | 100%+ | -100% acceptable | Product-market fit, not Rule of 40 |
| Series B | 70-100% | -50% to -20% | Efficient growth trajectory |
| Series C | 50-80% | -30% to 0% | Path to profitability visible |
| Late Stage | 30-50% | 0% to 15% | Rule of 40 critical |
| Pre-IPO | 25-40% | 10%+ | Must achieve 40+ |
2023-2025 Shift in Equity-Backed Companies:
| ARR Range | 2023 Median | 2025 Median | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1-3M | -53% margin | -8% margin | +45pp improvement |
| $3-10M | -35% margin | -12% margin | +23pp improvement |
| $10-30M | -20% margin | -5% margin | +15pp improvement |
Companies have dramatically reduced burn in response to tighter funding markets.
Public SaaS Company Benchmarks (2025)
How do public SaaS companies score? Reference points for benchmarking:
Top Performers (Rule of 40 > 50%):
| Company | Growth | Margin | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doximity | 15% | 40% | 55% | Healthcare, high margins |
| Veeva | 12% | 38% | 50% | Life sciences, mature |
| ServiceNow | 22% | 28% | 50% | Enterprise, scale |
Solid Performers (Rule of 40: 35-50%):
| Company | Growth | Margin | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce | 11% | 32% | 43% | Mature, profitable |
| CrowdStrike | 35% | 8% | 43% | Security, growth focus |
| Datadog | 27% | 14% | 41% | Observability |
| HubSpot | 21% | 16% | 37% | Marketing/Sales |
| MeridianLink | 10% | 26% | 36% | Fintech |
Below Benchmark (<35%):
| Company | Growth | Margin | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monday.com | 32% | 0% | 32% | PLG, investing in growth |
| Klaviyo | 23% | 2% | 25% | Marketing automation |
| Snowflake | 30% | -8% | 22% | Data, heavy investment |
Valuation Correlation:
| Rule of 40 Range | Median EV/Revenue Multiple |
|---|---|
| 60%+ | 15x+ |
| 40-60% | 10-15x |
| 30-40% | 6-10x |
| 20-30% | 4-6x |
| <20% | 2-4x |
Strategies to Improve Your Rule of 40 Score
Tactical approaches based on your current position:
If Growth Is Your Weakness (Below 20%):
| Strategy | Impact | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Net Revenue Retention focus | High | 6-12 months |
| Expansion revenue (upsells) | High | 3-6 months |
| New product lines | Medium | 12-24 months |
| Geographic expansion | Medium | 6-18 months |
| Channel partnerships | Medium | 6-12 months |
| Price increases | Medium | Immediate |
If Profitability Is Your Weakness (Below 0%):
| Strategy | Impact | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Reduce CAC (optimize funnel) | High | 3-6 months |
| Improve gross margin (cloud costs) | Medium | 3-6 months |
| Sales efficiency (quota attainment) | High | 6-12 months |
| Reduce G&A overhead | Medium | Immediate |
| Automate customer success | Medium | 6-12 months |
| Right-size engineering | Medium | 3-6 months |
High-Impact Levers:
| Lever | Rule of 40 Impact |
|---|---|
| +5% Net Revenue Retention | +5 points (growth) |
| -10% churn | +3-5 points (growth) |
| 10% reduction in cloud costs | +1-2 points (margin) |
| 20% improvement in sales efficiency | +2-3 points (margin) |
| 15% headcount reduction | +3-5 points (margin) |
Warning: Cutting growth investments to boost margins often backfires. Declining growth rates can hurt score more than margin gains help.
The Rule of X: Alternative Framework
Critics argue Rule of 40 undervalues growth. The Rule of X addresses this:
Rule of X Formula:
Rule of X = (2 × Growth Rate) + Profit Margin
Growth is weighted 2x because:
- Growth compounds over time
- High-growth companies can improve margins later
- Market share is often winner-take-most in SaaS
Comparison:
| Company | Growth | Margin | Rule of 40 | Rule of X |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 40% | 0% | 40 | 80 |
| B | 20% | 20% | 40 | 60 |
| C | 50% | -20% | 30 | 80 |
| D | 10% | 30% | 40 | 50 |
Under Rule of 40, Companies A, B, and D score equally. Under Rule of X, high-growth Company A and C score best.
When to Use Which:
| Framework | Best For |
|---|---|
| Rule of 40 | Mature SaaS ($50M+ ARR), PE-backed |
| Rule of X | Early-stage, high-growth, VC-backed |
| Both | Comprehensive assessment |
Investor Preferences:
- Growth equity: Often use Rule of 40
- Venture capital: Increasingly use Rule of X
- Public markets: Rule of 40 dominates
The Rule of X is gaining adoption but hasn't displaced Rule of 40 as the standard benchmark.
Common Rule of 40 Mistakes and Misconceptions
Avoid these errors when calculating and interpreting your score:
Calculation Mistakes:
| Mistake | Problem | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Using quarterly growth | Overstates annualized growth | Use YoY or TTM growth |
| Mixing ARR and revenue | Inconsistent comparison | Use same metric throughout |
| Excluding SBC from EBITDA | Understates true costs | Many analysts include SBC now |
| Using gross margin | Wrong profit metric | Use EBITDA or operating margin |
| Point-in-time calculation | Misses trends | Track quarterly over time |
Interpretation Mistakes:
| Mistake | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Rule of 40 is minimum acceptable" | Median is 12%—40+ is top quartile |
| "Growth always beats profitability" | Post-2022, efficient growth wins |
| "Negative margins are fine if growing fast" | Only if growth is 50%+ AND improving |
| "Rule of 40 doesn't apply to early stage" | True, but path to 40+ should be visible |
| "Higher is always better" | Depends on stage and sustainability |
Context Matters:
| Situation | Rule of 40 Relevance |
|---|---|
| Pre-PMF startup | Low—focus on product |
| Seed/Series A | Low—growth rate matters more |
| Series B+ | Medium—trajectory matters |
| Series C and beyond | High—key investor metric |
| Pre-IPO/IPO | Critical—affects pricing |
| Mature public company | Very high—earnings expectations |
Red Flags:
- Score declining for 3+ quarters
- Growth slowing while margins flat
- Margins improving only via headcount cuts
- Score achieved through one-time events
Pro Tips
- 💡Use trailing twelve-month (TTM) figures for both growth and profit metrics to smooth quarterly volatility.
- 💡Track your Rule of 40 score quarterly and monitor the trend—three consecutive quarters of decline is a red flag.
- 💡Be consistent with your profit metric definition (EBITDA is standard) and clearly disclose your methodology to investors.
- 💡Benchmark against companies at your stage and ARR level, not just public company outliers.
- 💡Remember that improving net revenue retention has 2x impact—it boosts growth AND reduces churn-related costs.
- 💡If your score is below 20%, focus on the weaker component rather than trying to improve both simultaneously.
- 💡Don't sacrifice growth investments for short-term margin improvements—declining growth often hurts more than margin gains help.
- 💡Model your Rule of 40 trajectory over 3-5 years for investor presentations—show the path to 40+.
- 💡Consider the Rule of X (2x growth weighting) if you're a high-growth company raising from VCs who prefer this framework.
- 💡Watch for "fake" improvements like one-time cost cuts or unsustainable price increases—investors will see through them.
- 💡Include stock-based compensation in your margin calculations for transparency - investors are increasingly including SBC as a real cost.
- 💡Build a Rule of 40 dashboard with monthly updates so the entire leadership team can see progress in real-time.
- 💡Focus on improving net revenue retention before new logo acquisition - it impacts both growth and margin simultaneously.
- 💡Present both Rule of 40 and Rule of X scores to investors to show you understand the nuances of efficient growth metrics.
- 💡Use cohort analysis to identify which customer segments drive the best unit economics and focus sales efforts there.
- 💡Track sales efficiency metrics like CAC payback period alongside Rule of 40 - they tell complementary stories about business health.
- 💡Consider geographic expansion as a growth lever - entering new markets can provide growth without sacrificing profitability.
- 💡Monitor gross margin trends separately - declining gross margin often indicates pricing pressure or scaling challenges.
- 💡Build scenario models showing how different strategic choices (hiring, pricing, product investments) affect your Rule of 40 trajectory.
- 💡Use the Rule of 40 framework to evaluate M&A targets - acquisitions should improve your combined score over time.
- 💡Communicate Rule of 40 context to your board - raw numbers without industry/stage context can lead to misaligned expectations.
- 💡Track leading indicators like pipeline growth and NPS that predict future Rule of 40 performance before it shows in financials.
- 💡Consider implementing a balanced scorecard approach that weights Rule of 40 alongside customer satisfaction and employee engagement.
- 💡Use industry-specific benchmarks - vertical SaaS companies often have different efficiency profiles than horizontal platforms.
- 💡Plan for seasonality in your Rule of 40 projections - Q4 enterprise deals may spike growth while Q1 shows a dip.
- 💡Document your Rule of 40 methodology for due diligence - investors will scrutinize how you calculate each component.
- 💡Consider the "Rule of 40 per employee" metric to understand operational efficiency alongside top-line performance.
- 💡Model the impact of pricing changes on your Rule of 40 - price increases directly boost both growth and margin.
- 💡Track your Rule of 40 score relative to your ARR growth rate bucket for proper peer comparison.
- 💡Use Rule of 40 as a framework for budget planning - allocate resources to maximize combined growth + margin outcomes.
- 💡Compare your Rule of 40 against your funding stage peers - Series A companies have different expectations than Series D+.
- 💡Include Rule of 40 analysis in monthly financial reviews to catch trends before they become quarterly surprises.
- 💡Remember that Rule of 40 is a simplification - complement it with LTV/CAC, magic number, and burn multiple for complete picture.
- 💡Set quarterly OKRs tied to specific Rule of 40 improvement targets to align the entire organization around efficient growth.
- 💡Use Rule of 40 projections in fundraising materials to demonstrate understanding of investor priorities and metrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
In 2025, a score of 40+ puts you in the top 16% of SaaS companies—it's genuinely exceptional, not just "good." The median score is only 12% (10% growth + 6% EBITDA margin). Scores of 30-40% are solid and fundable. Below 20% signals potential issues. Context matters: early-stage companies growing 80%+ can justify negative scores, while mature companies should target 35%+.
